MIP Logo

Dashboard Week | Day 2 | London Energy Consumption (Smart Meter dataset)

This post was originally published on The Data School blog between 2018 and July 2025, before our program was renamed to MIP’s Analytics Career Accelerator. References throughout this article to “The Data School” or “DS” all refer to what is now MIP’s Analytics Career Accelerator. The program, its people, and its commitment to launching outstanding analytics careers remain the same – just under a new name.

If you are having trouble viewing this article, please report it here. 

For this challenge, I decided to answer the following question: Are demographics properly represented in London’s smart meter experiment?

Interestingly, affluent groups account for 39% of the sample size in the experiment while these groups only account for 12% of London’s 8 million population. My suspicion for the relatively high representation of affluent groups is that the latter tend to consume more energy hence why a higher proportion was included in the sample. Among the affluent groups, the career climbers accounted for most of the sample size (between 70-80%).  Yet, I have identified that the city sophisticates consume more energy on average compared to other affluent groups apart from the lavish lifestyle group.

Below is a snapshot of my dashboard, which you can access here:

And now, I would like to outline the approach that I have taken to merge the required datasets to power the dashboard:

Step 1 – Combine daily energy consumption and household attributes.

 

Step 2 – Summarise the spatial data and split it into 2 groups: affluent vs other groups.

 

Next steps

I was not able to find out why the city sophisticates consumed more energy. So, there is room for more investigation. To do so, the index dataset needs to be re-shaped and wrangled and fed into the association analysis tool – which allow me to obtain Pearson correlation measures across all index categories.

 

Share this post